Everything begins with a kindergarten where they make you sleep in the afternoon, not paying attention to the desires and features of the child. Next, we all go to school, in it they teach only subordination, alas, nothing more, neither thinking, nor knowledge. Our school forces to learn by himself, but the majority does not want and cannot do it. The level of modern education is a murderously low, recalling how much the tribes knew at my time – I want to send them to school again – they will be excellent students (well, if not 12 points – then 10-11 for sure). The school brings up the crowd, which is easy to manipulate (though some of our rulers are also missing even for this). Then there is unemployment, to manage a person who is afraid to lose work is very easy. In fact, the state can employ most of the unemployed in a couple of months (outside the crisis and for six months during it). Everyone knows the example of Roosevelt who has leaving the United States from the most famous crisis in the economy. And our oligarchic state generally serves only great capital, draft new laws confirm this.
The following dependence is drawn in how the state increases prices for everything. Primarily for energy. Few people know that the state has a tax in the tax base such as VAT (and in almost all countries it is, I know for sure in the USA – no) – its income is growing in progression.
Of other dependencies, it is worth noting the following: pensions, social benefits and other payments.
And the last, but only in the text, this is the introduction of various kinds of restrictions and prohibitions. Which most supports. The crowd is a crowd, alas. After all, in order to understand why this is done, you need to think. And we were not taught this anywhere.
I will give a simple example. The ban on wearing weapons in Ukraine and Russia (and many others prohibit, I just know the situation in these countries, and I write in Russian). From a person’s point of view, this ban is meaningless in many countries, and in ours it is simply harmful to horror. Opponents of the free wearing of weapons always say that we will shoot each other. And they refer to the USA, where, it happens, shoot in schools. But China where weapons are prohibited, like much more, schoolchildren are cut by knives and dozens cut, forget (or maybe they don’t know) about teenagers in Russia and Ukraine, who are scored to death, and forget that our people’s chosen ones shoot children for fun. In Moldova, where the weapons were allowed for a long time – there are no US problems, and no one shot down. And now about totalitarianism, in the United States, a resolution to weapons, initially, served the purpose of protecting citizens from unlawful actions of the state.
Judge for yourself if weapons have all those who need it, except for ordinary citizens; T. e. police (there is already a police in Russia, but the essence is the same), which is already more likely an offending body, the bandits of all stripes (I think that everyone will agree with me – who needs it, they will get) and t). D. But we do not have what it leads to – think … And if you do not want – my opinion is this: it leads to lawlessness. If you had a pistol in your pocket, would you be afraid of bandits as now? I think the answer is obvious, no. But they would fear you much more now. Would be allowed by the police to violate our rights with you so roughly? There is only one answer – no.